Friday, April 28, 2023

Coffee Cupping for the Novice

 

Ahh, coffee! It's practically a religion in science. Cups often fuel a late night working on a proposal or finishing a paper. Carafes are never far at research seminars and conferences. Chances are good that when you last made a new collaborator they were holding it in their hands. While some aren't picky about what they drink, others have very defined preparations and purveyors. For this week's post, PhD student Elisa Dong decided to take a deeper dive and reports back on a coffee cupping event that she recently attended. (see the bottom of the post for a description of the image above)

by Elisa Dong

The best description I have for the act and event that is coffee cupping, is to align it with the better known wine tasting. One sips at the drink at specific temperatures in standardized vessels, makes notes, and repeats this task to compare with another offering. Techniques vary a bit from taster to taster, but for coffee cupping, it is normal to have a shallow spoon that dips into the coffee, and suck it in quickly to aerate the liquid.

I went to my first (and to date, only) coffee cupping event some weeks back. The event details were forwarded from a friend of mine that I had introduced to pour-overs (a way to make coffee) some years ago. I reached out on my dusty instagram account (that definitely has a suspicious sounding fake name) asking to attend, and was informed that I was welcome. So, I showed up to a coffee machine distributor's workplace in the middle of the day and work week somewhere in the east end of Toronto. It took a few minutes to find my way through the building, which was partially office, partially showroom, and partially restaurant. There were maybe 25 of us, including the hosts of the event.

It became apparent very quickly that I was the only one who hadn't "cupped" before, so there was a brief explanation of the general process and what the plans for the day where. Here's what I got out of the process.

Prep:
-        there are 14 coffees on the table in similar sized and shaped vessels
-        each of the coffees had been ground minutes before, with the same mass and grind size

Sniff round:
-        we went around sniffing the freshly ground coffee and agitating the grains within the cups to get a deeper sniff 

Bloom:
-        each of the coffees was bloomed at the same temperature, and agitated with the same manner
-      the foamy surface was removed and we were left with coffee immersing in water, settling to the bottom of the cup
-        a water wash cup was available at each coffee to rinse off the sample spoon
 
Cupping:
-        we did three rounds of tastings.
-        The first was blind, shortly after the bloom (higher temperature),
-        round two/three took place when the coffees cooled to just above room temperature,
-      and after we were informed about what it was we were tasting (country, farm, origin, processing, extra details) 

Figure 1. Me with a spoon. Circles show placement of coffee cups on a very long table.

My takes:
-    I enjoyed samples 1-2 the most from sniffing the pre-soaked grounds, they had a "classic" coffee profile that I enjoy. Chocolatey and nutty
-    samples 3-5 smelled like tea and were barely distinguishable from the background
-    samples 8-14 smelled like various things, but generally fruity and floral, some more full bodied than others
-    unsurprisingly, the chocolatey smelling coffees fell a bit flat on tasting. The complex body and richness went away in the brew
-    sample 5 or 6 didn't remind me of cotton candy, as it did to another person, but it was bright and pungent
-    samples 7 and 8 tasted extremely similar, one more rounded out than the other in mouth feel. Both more dynamic and berry like
-    samples 9 through 12 were all variations on florals and stone fruits, one with a strawberry kick, and another with white florals
-    sample 13 was a more muted floral coffee
-    our wildhorse, sample 14, was predominantly silt by the time I got to it, but it was quite possibly the most flavourful coffee that wasn't a punch of acid in the mouth

Information (from memory):
-    samples 1-2 were Brazilian coffees from a large scale grower. These were grown and processed with the intent of being crowd pleasers. For purchasing purposes, they were the cheapest of the lots
-    samples 3-5 were from Rwanda (this was a surprise to many at the event). We received a brief political story discussing the origins of taking back parts of the coffee production from the government
-    samples 6 and 7 I have forgotten the origins of, but they were coffees that had undergone various types of microbial treatment as part of someone's PhD thesis. They might have been from Ethiopia
-    samples 8 and 9 were coffees from Mexico (another gasp) that had also received inoculation of sorts for various lengths of time
-    samples 10-13 were Geishas (alt: Gesha) from various regions in the world. Floral and fruity indeed. I confirmed I didn't see the hype, though I could see the appeal drinking in the range of coffee from time to time
-    sample 13 was sourced from Taiwan. The most expensive cup there due to the lack of desire to sell outside of the country
-    sample 14 was a guest brought coffee, allegedly from some producer that only sells to one roaster per country, and said roaster has to fly in to pick up the coffee (in Canada, it's Monogram). Regrettably, I cannot remember what farm it was (Elida perhaps, I'm sure someone can correct me)

I highly recommend giving cupping a go! Whether it's for coffee or for something else. Having two cups of liquid brewed under similar conditions and throughout cooling is a fun way to train the palate and perhaps your appreciation for various tasting notes. I, for one, am still on the hunt for the perfect chocolate/nutty/toffee combo that actually tastes like it smells. One day. I left the event only slightly caffeinated and with a list of shops to check out to reduce disappointment in the Toronto coffee scene. We also pulled shots of an experimental espresso that tasted like battery acid + mango. Good stuff. Perhaps unsurprisingly, I also found that some of the individuals there shared similar hobbies and had the same complaints about coffee. Spontaneously attending free events that sound fun is not as difficult as I thought it would be, though it does seem that they are mostly run through social media.

Shout-out to Stealth Coffee Systems and Forward Coffee for running the tasting! And all the nice roasters/buyers/hobbyists that were real friendly and happy to share their thoughts. For a future blog post, I might dig up an ancient report I made on coffee shops and their Yelp rating validity throughout San Francisco that I submitted as my work term report that year. A more detailed version of this post may be available later on my own blog at abstract-ED.me.

___

Caption for the image at the top of this article: In slightly unrelated content, I went coffee-hopping with someone I met at the event the next day. Look at this teeny tiny little Hario setup (can be seen at The Library on Dundas St.)! For scale, the carafe is less than 1 inch tall. Apparently you can buy these via gacha machine, or opened on ebay/etsy. If anyone is looking to send me gifts, you know where to go!

Sunday, April 23, 2023

James Webb Space Telescope Update

 

The James Webb Space Telescope is able to view the universe in a truly new light. Below, MSc student Madeline Walters takes a look at some of the recent discoveries this new observatory has made. Image above: https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/25/2022/01/JWST-galaxies-ba2f7b8.jpg

by Madeline Walters

It’s been a while since my last Webb update, but since then the space telescope has been busy! To kick off 2023, NASA released a statement [1] about how the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was used to capture the shadows of starlight cast by the thin rings of Chariklo, an ice small body located around 2 billion miles away from the orbit of Saturn. As the JWST observed Chariklo passing in front of a background star, the expected obstruction of that star's light occurred- a phenomenon called occultation- which allowed for the observation of a spectrum of the body’s surface. This showed evidence of crystalline water ice, which was previously only a guess from ground-based observations.
 
However, what surprised astronomers was that the starlight dipped twice rapidly before Chariklo passed in front of it, and then twice again as Chariklo moved away. These rapid dips in light were caused by the two thin rings of Chariklo - the first to ever be detected around such a small body. Since Chariklo is so small and far away, the JWST isn’t able to directly image the rings, but with occultation and the JWST’s heightened sensitivity, there is a hope that the composition of the rings may be isolated from the main body, allowing for further study.
 
Along with being able to get a closer look at smaller and more distant bodies with higher precision, the JWST has been showing us other things at higher resolutions than before. Take for example the side by side comparison of the ‘Pillars of Creation’ photos taken by NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope and JWST:

Image caption: A side by side comparison of the Pillars of Creation taken by the Hubble Space Telescope (left), and the JWST (right). Each image shows the same region taken in different wavelength ranges. The Hubble image is taken in the visible light range with different colors representing different molecules, while the JWST image is taken in the near-infrared range, allowing us to peer through the dust. (https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01GF44F9Y10HZB8SPV2NZ8H6TZ.png)

On the left we have the Hubble image. This incredible and iconic image of towering cosmic dust in the heart of the Eagle Nebula shows us the primary components of what makes up these pillars [2]. Different gasses are represented by different colors here to allow us to visualize it better: blue is oxygen, red is sulfur, and green is both nitrogen and hydrogen. While the colors aren’t what we would see in real life, the structure is similar, since this is taken in the visible light wavelength range.

Now compare that to the image on the right of the same location taken by the JWST. Why is this different? It’s not just because the JWST has larger mirrors-it also comes down to the wavelength range between Hubble and JWST. Hubble observes in the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared ranges, while JWST observes in the near and mid-infrared range. This allows the JWST to pierce through obstructing dust and gas that shows up in the visible range, and show a view of the pillars we aren’t as familiar with, but isn’t any less stunning. More images reveal this difference between Hubble and JWST, such as these images of the Southern Ring Nebula, with Hubble on the left and JWST on the right:

Image caption: A comparison of the Southern Ring Nebula (NGC 3132) taken by Hubble (left) and the JWST (right)Each is taken in different wavelength ranges with different colors representing different gases, showing varying level of detail of the region. (https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01EVVFSTZYZJJKAB41KA6AJ0HQ.png; https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_feature/public/thumbnails/image/main_image_stellar_death_s_ring_miri_nircam_sidebyside-5mb.jpg)

With the JWST, we can see in higher detail the rings of gas and dust thrown out by a dying star that we previously could not see in the Hubble image. Hubble has taught us some amazing things about the universe, but with the JWST, we can shed new light (in longer wavelengths) on objects in space previously unseen. Even just a few days ago, the JWST detected a dust storm raging on an exoplanet about 40 light years away [3]. The more we’re able to see, and the further back in time we are able to peer, the more we can learn about the universe and our place in it.

[1] https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2023/01/25/webb-spies-chariklo-ring-system-with-high-precision-technique/

[2] https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/the-pillars-of-creation

[3] https://webbtelescope.org/contents/news-releases/2023/news-2023-105