What I’ve Learned Starting Grad School from Home

 This week Grace Bischof talks about the challenges of starting a research-based graduate degree from home during the pandemic. I look forward to meeting Grace and the rest of my new students (hopefully) in the summer or fall of 2020.
(image source: https://www.pexels.com/photo/silver-imac-on-white-table-4185956/)

 by Grace Bischof

Somehow, we are now 10 months deep into a pandemic. Pandemic fatigue has hit in waves, but with record-breaking new cases across Canada, it is still very much a part of daily life. Because of this, my first three months of grad school have looked a little bit different than normal. Today I thought I would share 4 things I’ve learned while beginning my Master’s degree from home.

1)    Setting a schedule is essential. This seems obvious, but it has been the most important factor for staying productive. One of my courses has live meetings on Wednesday at 10:30 am and 2 pre-recorded videos posted throughout the week. Making sure that I watch those videos every Monday and Friday by 10:30 am is the only way I can keep up with the course content. One week I decided I would watch a pre-recorded lecture at another time because I had other things to work on, subsequently falling behind for about 4 lectures and needing to scramble to catch up again. Sometimes it is hard to keep a schedule from home, but sticking with it creates much needed structure during a strange time.

2)     Keep in contact with lab members/coworkers. Starting grad school is difficult. Starting grad school without having met anyone from the lab in person or ever stepping foot on the school campus is even more difficult. I feel lucky that PVL is very encouraging about reaching out for help with any problems. As a naturally shy person, asking for help, especially from people who I have never met in real life, can be tricky. But the environment fostered within the group has made it easy to do so. So, while I can’t swing by someone’s desk on campus to ask for help, I’ve been able to solve problems by sending a quick message to other group members over Slack.

3)    The time normally spent commuting can be used for work, but doesn’t have to be. One of the main benefits of working from home for most people is cutting out the time spent on the road getting to campus. During my undergrad, it took about 40 minutes from the time I left my house to stepping into the building for classes. I didn’t realize how much I appreciate that hour spent commuting until it was gone. Because I couldn’t do work on the bus, I used that time to listen to music and relax. Without the commute, I have an extra hour in my day to work, which I’m often thankful for during busy weeks. I have also listened to less music than ever before. It is important to understand that the commute time can be added to your work day, but it also okay to keep that time for things that keep you sane. This point is still a work-in-progress for me, but I think I’m starting to find a balance.

4)    Make time for the things you love. This is a continuation off the last point, but extends further than commuting time. While working from home, it is very hard to separate work from leisure. With my desk set up in my house, I feel guilty if I’m not at my desk and focused for an absurd number of hours in the day. This isn’t practical. I make time for myself daily by taking my dog for a walk with my mom, reading every night before bed, and Zooming my roommates from undergrad every Tuesday to watch the Bachelorette together. This ensures that work hours are spent productively working and leisure hours are spent peacefully recharging my brain.  

     I’m really thankful for the time I’ve had so far in grad school. Despite the experience not being normal, I’ve gained a lot – both academically and personally. Although, if any future graduate students stumble across this blog post, I sincerely hope that you are back on campus and you don’t have to listen to a word of what I wrote.

Impacts of Stellar Flares on the Search for Habitable Exoplanets

 This week, Justin Kerr examines the impact of stellar flares on the habitability of exoplanets. Of particular interest are M-dwarfs, whose habitable zone lies very close to the star. Much has previously been made of flare activity associated with these stars and the potential effect of that flare activity upon the atmospheres of any planets found within their habitable zone.
(to view a video of the flare above visit https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA21584 )

by Justin Kerr

With the search for habitable exoplanets well underway, there has been much talk in popular science of the potential to find life-bearing worlds with telescopes such as Kepler and TESS. One of the most common points I have heard in the popular sphere against finding life with these missions is related to stellar flares. The argument is typically as follows: the transit method used to detect exoplanets with these telescopes mostly finds small stars (of spectral type M, to be specific); these M stars and particularly red dwarfs such as TRAPPIST-1 tend to produce frequent stellar flares; therefore the flares will cause planets to be incapable of maintaining an ozone layer and the life which depends on such a layer. While this is certainly true to some extent, it is not the case that all red dwarfs produce frequent flares – and in some cases, stellar flares may even be required for their exoplanets to support life as we know it. In either extreme case, it is clear that an understanding of the possible effects of stellar flares and their frequency is important when evaluating the possibility of life existing on newly discovered exoplanets. 

First of all, are these popular accounts correct about stellar flares making life impossible? The most well-known consequence of stellar flares is their tendency to be accompanied by a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME), something that happens right here in our solar system. In a CME, plasma from the star is launched outwards by strong magnetic fields. The Carrington Event in 1859 was a CME associated with a solar flare which, while not strong enough to cause any atmospheric disturbances beyond intense auroras, did result in massive disturbances to the telegraph systems used at the time. A similar event in modern times would cause extensive problems in our electrical systems, but much stronger events must be considered for highly active red dwarf stars. Not only are these stars more active, but potentially habitable planets must be located much closer to the star than is the case with the Sun in order to receive enough heat to maintain liquid water. This makes them more likely to be hit by strong CMEs, as CMEs release their energy in a narrow and directed region. The main threat of highly energetic CMEs to habitability is their capability to “blow off” the atmosphere of an exoplanet over multiple events, similar in function to a very strong solar wind.

While CMEs are commonly discussed due to their threat to our modern technology here on Earth, the removal of the ozone layer by stellar protons from flares is much more concerning for exoplanets around small stars. Studies such as Tilley et al. (2019) have shown that flares with energies of about two orders of magnitude stronger than the Carrington event that occur once a month or more would be enough to make an exoplanet incapable of maintaining an ozone layer. This would lead to the sterilization of the exoplanet’s surface by the excess UV radiation, in an extreme version of the ozone layer hole on Earth which is only now beginning to recover after the Montreal Protocol stopped the widespread use of CFCs. A recent study by Günther et al. (2020) that examined 1228 flaring stars found in the first exoplanet hunting dataset released by TESS found that about 100 of the stars would meet the flare frequency requirements to eliminate the possibility of an ozone layer on their associated exoplanets. While this is certainly a concern, this still leaves a large amount of red dwarf associated exoplanets presumably without this problem. 

These negative aspects of stellar flares are not the only way in which flares can affect exoplanets. There are in fact multiple ways that flares may instead support or even be required for the development of life. Since red dwarfs have low UV output, some exoplanets within the habitable zone may not receive enough UV light to support the prebiotic chemistry that life as we know it is based on. Of particular interest is the reaction that produces the RNA, which is required by life, as it only occurs in the presence of UV light. Since stellar flares can produce extra UV light, they could fill in the missing energy to allow prebiotic chemistry to occur around stars where it would otherwise be impossible. In the same study of flaring stars from TESS, Günther et al. found 14 stars where this may possibly be the case. While this is less than the amount of exoplanets where flares would make life impossible, ignoring the positive benefit of flares could cause us to miss habitable exoplanet candidates. 

Stellar flares are certainly a danger to the habitability of exoplanets around red dwarfs, but we have seen that this by no means eliminates the possibility of life on all them and in some cases may even be necessary. Instead of dismissing flares as a negative, we must instead study their effects and frequency in order to better predict where we might find new life. So the next time you hear a YouTube video or see an online comment suggest that life around red dwarfs is impossible thanks to flares sterilizing them, make sure to do a bit more research!

Sources: 

Günther et al. (https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab5d3a),
Tilley et al. (http://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2017.1794)